.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

In Reel Time

1.25.2006

Mrs. Henderson Presents ***

Mrs. Henderson Presents is a frolicking romp that highlights the history of London’s first nude review. Dame Judy Dench (Mrs. Henderson) plays an outspoken bored socialite whose late husband leaves her an absurd amount of money and nothing to do, so she buys a theatre. She hires Bob Hoskins (Vivian Van Damm) to run the theatre and power struggles, flirtation and bickering like an old married couple ensue.

This film is not nearly as bawdy as one might surmise; most of the nudity is actually quite tasteful. Although, there is some surprising full frontal male nudity that is actually pretty funny. Christopher Guest is fabulous as a stuffy old Lord who Henderson wraps around her little finger in the most amusing way. World War II breaks out in the middle of the film, but it manages to continue its initial comedic pace without getting mired in much sentimentality. There are some heavier moments in the second half of the film, but they are never dwelled upon enough to drag down the film, nor are they skimmed over so lightly they feel pointless.

For all the song and dance and bare skin, the best thing about this movie is still the chemistry and banter between Hoskins and Dench. But even as good as they are I don’t see why this is getting award nominations. This is a fun film, not too light and not too heavy.

1.17.2006

Our Golden Globe Picks - and the Globe goes to...

We're still busily watching movies before we come up with our year in review, but we have decided on our picks for the Golden Globe Winners. To view all of the nominees, visit the Golden Globe site. Winner are Highlighted in Green

BEST MOTION PICTURE – DRAMA
Sarai's Pick: BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN
Brandon's Pick GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A MOTION PICTURE – DRAMA
We Both Pick: GWYNETH PALTROW - PROOF
FELICITY HUFFMAN Transamerica

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE - DRAMA
Brandon's Pick: PHILIP SEYMOUR HOFFMAN - CAPOTE
Sarai's Pick:HEATH LEDGER - BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN

BEST MOTION PICTURE - MUSICAL OR COMEDY
Brandon's Pick: THE SQUID AND THE WHALE
Sarai's Pick WALK THE LINE

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A MOTION PICTURE - MUSICAL OR COMEDY
Brandon's Pick: JUDI DENCH - MRS. HENDERSON PRESENTS
Sarai's Pick:REESE WITHERSPOON - WALK THE LINE

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE -MUSICAL OR COMEDY
Brandon's Pick: JEFF DANIELS - THE SQUID AND THE WHALE
Sarai's Pick: JOAQUIN PHOENIX - WALK THE LINE

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM (most of these have yet to come out in the US, so it's still a bit of an educated guess)

JOYEUX NOEL (MERRY CHRISTMAS) (FRANCE)
Brandon's Pick: KUNG FU HUSTLE (CHINA)
Sarai's Pick: TSOTSI (SOUTH AFRICA)
PARADISE NOW (PALESTINE)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN A MOTION PICTURE
Sarai's Pick: FRANCES McDORMAND - NORTH COUNTRY
Brandon's Pick: MICHELLE WILLIAMS - BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN
RACHEL WEISZ – The Constant Gardener

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN A MOTION PICTURE
Sarai's Pick: MATT DILLON - CRASH
Brandon's Pick: PAUL GIAMATTI - CINDERELLA MAN
GEORGE CLOONEY – Syriana

BEST DIRECTOR - MOTION PICTURE
We Both Pick: GEORGE CLOONEY - GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK
ANG LEE – Brokeback Mountain

BEST SCREENPLAY - MOTION PICTURE
We Both Pick: GEORGE CLOONEY & GRANT HESLOV - GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK
LARRY McMURTRY & DIANA OSSANA – Brokeback Mountain

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE - MOTION PICTURE
Brandon's Pick: ALEXANDRE DESPLAT - SYRIANA
Sarai's Pick: JOHN WILLIAMS - MEMOIRS OF A GEISHA

BEST ORIGINAL SONG - MOTION PICTURE

Brandon's Pick: “A LOVE THAT WILL NEVER GROW OLD” — BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN
Music by: Gustavo Santaolalla, Lyrics by: Bernie Taupin

Sarai's Pick:“TRAVELIN’ THRU” — TRANSAMERICA
Music & Lyrics by: Dolly Parton

Brandon wanted to point out that he doesn't watch a lot of tv (although he schedules monday nights around 24) so his picks are a bit of an educated guess

BEST TELEVISION SERIES - DRAMA
Sarai's Pick: GREY’S ANATOMY (ABC)
Brandon's Pick: LOST (ABC)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A TELEVISION SERIES - DRAMA
Brandon's Pick: GLENN CLOSE - THE SHIELD
Sarai's Pick: GEENA DAVIS - COMMANDER IN CHIEF

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A TELEVISION SERIES - DRAMA
Sarai's Pick: PATRICK DEMPSEY - GREY’S ANATOMY
Brandon's Pick: HUGH LAURIE - HOUSE

BEST TELEVISION SERIES - MUSICAL OR COMEDY
Brandon's Pick: DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES (ABC)
Sarai's Pick: MY NAME IS EARL (NBC)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A TELEVISION SERIES - MUSICAL OR COMEDY
We Both Pick: FELICITY HUFFMAN - DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES
MARY-LOUISE PARKER – Weeds (neither of us get showtime, so who knew?)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A TELEVISION SERIES - MUSICAL OR COMEDY
Brandon's Pick: STEVE CARELL - THE OFFICE
Sarai's Pick: JASON LEE - MY NAME IS EARL

BEST MINI-SERIES OR MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION
We Both Pick: EMPIRE FALLS (HBO)

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A MINI-SERIES OR A MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION
Brandon's Pick: KELLY MacDONALD - THE GIRL IN THE CAFÉ
Sarai's Pick: CYNTHIA NIXON - WARM SPRINGS
S. EPATHA MERKERSON – Lackawanna Blues

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A MINI-SERIES OR A MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION
Sarai's Pick: ED HARRIS - EMPIRE FALLS
Brandon's Pick: BILL NIGHY - THE GIRL IN THE CAFÉ
JONATHAN RHYS MEYERS – Elvis

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN A SERIES, MINI-SERIES OR MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION
Sarai's Pick: SANDRA OH - GREY’S ANATOMY
Brandon's Pick: JOANNE WOODWARD - EMPIRE FALLS

BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN A SERIES, MINI-SERIES OR MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION

We Both Pick: PAUL NEWMAN - EMPIRE FALLS

1.13.2006

Walk the Line ****1/2

Walk the line is a great movie, I loved it. It’s thoroughly entertaining and managed to interweave a few of the more important stories from Johnny Cash’s life, those of redemption and love. There seems to be a lot of comparison to Ray circulating out there, which is unfortunate as I think Ray’s not even in the same ballpark. If you must compare this to another music biopic, please think more along the lines of the Coal Miner’s Daughter. But what sets this movie apart from other biopics is the powerful love story.

Joaquin Phoenix always manages to truly become whomever he plays and does another incredible job here, even mastering Cash’s hunched shouldered walk and learning to play guitar and sing. And yes, the boy can sing. Phoenix endowed Cash with a wounded soul and vulnerability. Reese Witherspoon sparkles on screen as June Carter Cash and is a delight in both her on stage performances and off-stage struggles. Their on-stage performances together were truly exciting to watch. Unlike most movie romances where one of the characters is generally a little off and they seem to have no problems other than romance, their love story has two strong-willed and complex people coming together in a way that doesn’t separate them from the realities and problems of their lives – making it much more real and more touching. I especially enjoyed the scenes with June’s family towards the end.

The beginning of the move is a bit mired in sentimentality and the oft portrayed troubled background of performers, with the archetypal distant and angry father and early tragedy. I didn’t really care for the scenes showing him trying to write songs, I suppose they had a point in being there but they weren’t really necessary – we know he wrote songs. The film doesn’t really pick up steam until Cash moves to Nashville. I sort of wish they’d just started the movie there. You don’t really see how he meets his first wife anyway, so it doesn’t seem too necessary to show his childhood as it’s all retold later through dialogue.

That being said, this film still has what most films this year have been missing – heart and soul, and lots of it.

1.06.2006

The Squid and the Whale - ****

The Squid and the Whale is a subtle and realistic account of a family's struggles through a divorce in the mid-80s. The story is told through the perspectives of the divorcing couple's two boys, one in the throws of teenage angst and the other at the beginning of puberty and self exploration. The film takes you from the eldest son's hero worship of his father to the realization that both of his parents are just as flawed as he is. Eventually he faces this reality and his fears, which is perfectly symbolized in the end of the film by the squid and the whale. Which I'll admit, before seeing the film I thought it was just as stupid a title for a movie as you probably do, but after seeing it - it's actually quite perfect.

Jeff Daniels excels as the narcissistic professor whose greatest achievements are all behind him. Laura Linney delivers another absolutely flawless performance, I'm starting to think she is Hollywood's most overlooked actress. William Baldwin shows up as a funny, but believable tennis pro. Anna Paquin continues to underutilize her talents by showing up in another small role as a sexual explicit lit student and lust object, with just enough screen time to make us wish she was getting leads instead of just making X-men movies. Both the eldest son (Jesse Eisenberg) and the young son (Owen Kline) are perfectly cast and manage both sincerity and nuance.

Overall, the thing that sets this movie apart is it's simplicity and honesty. Nothing in the film seems contrived or even untrue. It's written and directed by Noah Baumbach who based the story on his childhood experiences, and while I'm sure some of it is fictitious or at least exaggerated, the film itself feels like you are watching someone's real life unfold. It's well acted, well told and thoroughly enjoyable.

1.05.2006

King Kong- ***1/2

To get ready for Peter Jackson’s King Kong I rented both of the earlier versions. I found I was pleasantly surprised at how good the original is, and more sickened by how stupid the 70s version is. Jackson’s remake falls somewhere in between. He does manage to capture much of the spectacle of the original, but he’s also mired in the tedium of the 70s remake.

The movie begins with a quick overview of New York in the 30s (flashes of Cinderella Man) before introducing us to Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts), a vaudeville actress who finds herself out of work. She loves the plays of Jack Driscoll (Adrien Brody), who is actually writing a movie for Carl Denham (Jack Black), an adventurous filmmaker who is down on his luck. Denham helps Darrow out of a jam and talks her into starring in his new film, and away they sail to Skull Island. This section of the movie is, for the most part, unnecessary. It feels as if Jackson, bloated from his Lord of the Rings success, has forgotten how to pace a movie. He tries to build suspense, but it comes off mostly flat. Despite a couple clever nods to the original, the whole first hour feels crowded, yet uncompelling.

The action finally begins when they arrive at the island. Only, this time, the natives are vicious, cold-blooded killers for some reason. They of course kidnap Ann to be sacrificed to Kong, a giant gorilla they worship. There are two incredible sequences on the island, one as the rescue team tries to outrun a herd of dinosaurs, and another when Kong fights not just one, but three tyrannosauruses. These are great action scenes, and I can’t figure out why the rest of the movie isn’t more like them.

The longer the movie goes on, the more it solidifies itself. It actually becomes quite tragic by the end, as Kong faces down a fleet of biplanes. Kong is more than a fish-out-of-water monster, he’s given real emotions and actions. Jackson manages to humanize Kong in a way he just can’t manage to humanize his characters. Particularly the character of Denham. Instead of being the rugged, reckless adventurer from the original, he’s now more of a sniveling, greedy little man. Black fits the part perfectly, but you never like him. The best performance though, not counting Andy Serkis as Kong, is from Naomi Watts. Her character has a depth that no one else in the movie does, and she fills it out completely.

The movie itself, despite being overlong and extremely self-indulgent, is still not a bad movie. It is exciting, fun, and except for a couple moments, visually stunning. But I feel like Jackson is becoming less and less interested in pacing his movies (the tedious new director’s cut of The Frighteners is a testament to this). King Kong manages to survive this, and I’m hoping that Jackson relearns how to edit before his movies become unwatchable.

--reviewed by Brandon

The Producers- **1/2

I really wanted to like this. But, unfortunately, I've seen the original and I know how good it is. Or maybe it's because for the second time this year, I'’ve seen someone attempt (and fail) to fill Gene Wilder's shoes. Or maybe my distaste for the way Broadway has just been remaking movies into uninspired musicals had something to do with it. Either way, as much as I tried to like The Producers, I just couldn'’t.

This time out, Nathan Lane (doing a rather credible Zero Mostel) is Broadway producer Max Bialystock, and Matthew Broderick (doing his lines almost exactly like Gene Wilder) is accountant Leo Bloom. They come up with a scheme to put on the worst play ever made, "Springtime for Hitler,"” and run off with the backer's money. Of course, complications ensue.

And that'’s what made the original so funny. The scenes zip by quickly, barely leaving you with a second before launching into another ridiculous character or situation. This time each scene has to have a song, which drags the joke out until it becomes tedious. The songs are uninspired, and mostly boring. There isn't a single one I'’d want to listen to again outside of the movie (I didn't particularly want to hear them in the movie, really). The one saving grace is the scene where they recruit flamboyant director Roger De Bris (Gary Beach) and his assistant Carmen Ghia (Roger Bart). This is a hilarious scene, and truthfully updates the original. Much of the rest of the movie just plays as a bad photocopy.

The other annoying thing is what they add. Ulla (Uma Thurman) is no longer the pointless secretary, but now a full-fledged romantic interest for Bloom. De Bris now plays Hitler onstage, and LSD is cut out completely (not to mention his hilarious song). A scene of Bloom at his accounting firm is clever, but like the rest of the songs goes on too long and slows down the film's momentum. And the end… The end goes on probably 20 minutes longer than it needs to.

But to completely compare it to the original isn't entirely fair. The movie is not without laughs of its own. Will Ferrell is funny as Franz, even if his scenes are hampered by animatronic pigeons. As I mentioned above, the film comes to life whenever De Bris and Ghia are onscreen. But these bursts are few and far between.

I haven'’t seen the stage version, and really don'’t have any plans to. Maybe what they're trying for in the movie plays better on stage, but as a film it doesn't work. It has very little zing, and feels like it's floundering around for its over two hour running time. Instead of winning the audience over, The Producers becomes just one more remakes in a sea of remakes. Maybe they should just start re-releasing the originals?

--reviewed by Brandon

Casanova- ***1/2

Casanova is basically a Shakespearean play with modern language. There are women dressed like men, people pretending to be people they'’re not, a clown, and of course every one gets together in the end and love conquers all. But Lasse Hallstrom is a little confused on how to direct the movie. He directs it like a period drama, with lush colors and beautiful shots of Venice. But the film needs a defter comedic touch. It's a farce that sometimes forgets it's a farce, and the long shots of scenery, while nice to look at, sometimes weighs the film down.

I’ve never seen any of the films Hallstrom directed in his native Sweden, but his American movies tend to be predictable and filled with a sweet, gooey center. He has perfected the dramady formula, and with the exception of What'’s Eating Gilbert Grape, takes the easiest way out every time. If the audience should laugh, someone trips. If the audience should cry, then someone should die or the couple should have a fight. But Casanova is a departure from this formula, which is good and bad at the same time.

Heath Ledger plays the legendary lover, pursued by the Inquisition for his many acts of indecency. He also owes several debts, and is being threatened with expulsion from Venice unless he gets married. He chooses a pretty young virgin named Victoria (Natalie Dormer), which angers Giovanni Bruni (Charlie Cox), a young man in love with Victoria. His sister, Francesca (Sienna Miller) soon becomes the object of CasanovaÂ's affection, due to her strong will. But she is engaged, against her will, to Lord Paprizzio (Oliver Platt), a lard merchant from Genoa. Oh, and the inquisition has sent Instigator Pucci (Jeremy Irons) to put an end to Casanova once and for all. And…cue the wacky hyjinks!

The performances are good, particularly Jeremy Irons, who manages to be extremely menacing and rather foolish at the same time. Oliver Platt is also funny as the befuddled lard merchant, and Natalie Dormer is hilarious as the freakishly horny Victoria. Sadly, the two leads are rather bland, but it seems to be more fault of the script than the acting. It would've been nice to see a little more wit inserted into the dialogue. Miller is just the typical ahead-of-her-time, strong-willed woman, and Ledger the typical charming rogue who becomes bumbling when around the woman. Boy, I'’d like to see a movie that pits a man and a woman against each other without the man having to be a bumbling doof...

Hallstrom has never been very good at creating deep characters, but luckily Casanova doesnÂ't require them. ItÂ's a movie about events, and while many of the events do include couples almost not getting together, we don'’t need to believe it. The movie is shallow and frothy, so the characters can be frothy and it doesn'’t detract. Hallstrom does a good job of toning down his melodramatic tendancies, so the movie doesn't sag in the last third. But as much as the movie'’s been done before, it'’s still entertaining. The flaws are easily overlooked, and if you give into it, you won't stop to think about how silly it really is. And while it misses the mark on the farce aspect, it'’s still funny enough to be worth the time. It may be fluff, but it's entertaining fluff, and it has to be better than most other romatic comedies floating around out there.

--reviewed by Brandon